I just updated my post answering a question from a coworker. It feels good to put that to rest.
A Quick Note on “Sports Fan”
I don’t recall what I was listening to when this popped into my head, but I was curious about the origin of fan used to mean a “supporter” or “devotee.” I recently installed Terminology across my devices and set the Online Etymology Dictionary as a preferred resource.
According to them:
1889, American English, originally of baseball enthusiasts, probably a shortening of fanatic, but it may be influenced by the fancy, a collective term for followers of a certain hobby or sport (especially boxing)… Fan mail attested from 1920, in a Hollywood context; Fan club attested by 1930.
I’m pleased that the best-guess origin is with baseball.
Zero-Sum Series Splits of One Run
The San Francisco Giants and San Diego Padres split their four-game series last week, with each team winning two games by one run. In our #social-baseball slack channel, my coworker asked:
any data whizzes wanna figure out how many MLB 4 game series have ended 2-2 with all one-run games?
I put myself on the case.
UPDATE JULY 6, 2025
I finally took the time to do this properly. I exported game-by-game data from Retrosheet since 1900 and (with the help of Claude) used pandas to analyze the data for these split series decided by one run each game.1The weirdest part about debugging code made by an LLM is interrogating their odd assumptions. Claude was exceedingly cautious in how it identified a four-game series. It originally allowed for a gap of up to 7 days between games of a pair of teams, which makes no sense. In baseball, a series is nearly always played on consecutive days. Once I corrected this error, my final count went from 32 to 49.
The list of 49 such series can be found here. The most recent occurrence before 2025 was a 2019 series between the Reds and Mets.
ORIGINAL APPROACH
I had no clean way to run a single query that pulled these because Stathead does not allow “OR” qualifiers in their search. So, this took slightly more manual work. This is what we do in the quest for knowledge.
This Stathead query contains the longest streaks of at least four regular season games such that every game’s run differential was between -1 and 1. I was only interested in streaks of exactly four games, so I went straight there.
I then sorted each page by total streak run differential, which is necessarily zero when both teams win two games in the series. Sorting by streak end date, I was able to peruse each page for consecutive rows with matching start and end dates—if the home team had one of these streaks, so did the visiting team.2There is a slight issue with this approach: what if one team had a streak of 4 games, but the other team had a streak of 5 or more because they had the necessary run differential before or after the four-game series? I only realized this problem while writing this post, but I’m too far into it to fix it this moment. I then manually checked that there wasn’t a coincidence in the matching dates, and also confirmed for older dates that it wasn’t part of a five-game series.
All that led to a list of the following four-game series3Again, I’m probably missing some because of the issue I pointed out above. I’ll try to fix that at a later point. where the teams each won two games, and all four games were won by exactly one run.
| Home | Visitor | Start Date | End Date |
| SFG | SDP | 2025-06-02 | 2025-06-05 |
| CHC | HOU | 1995-09-28 | 1995-10-01 |
| BAL | CLE | 1991-09-12 | 1991-09-15 |
| LAD | SDP | 1986-04-07 | 1986-04-10 |
| NYY | BAL | 1979-08-03 | 1979-08-06 |
| MIL | WSA | 1971-07-30 | 1971-08-01 (2) |
| SDP | NYM | 1970-05-01 | 1970-05-03 (2) |
| HOU | CHC | 1962-08-17 | 1962-08-19 |
| PHI | STL | 1961-08-29 (1) | 1961-08-31 |
| NYY | DET | 1957-07-26 | 1957-07-28 (2) |
| CLE | BOS | 1938-09-15 (1) | 1938-09-17 |
| STL | BSN | 1929-06-14 | 1929-06-16 (2) |
| BOS | CHW | 1920-05-15 | 1920-05-19 |
| BRO | PHI | 1904-06-21 | 1904-06-24 |
- 1The weirdest part about debugging code made by an LLM is interrogating their odd assumptions. Claude was exceedingly cautious in how it identified a four-game series. It originally allowed for a gap of up to 7 days between games of a pair of teams, which makes no sense. In baseball, a series is nearly always played on consecutive days. Once I corrected this error, my final count went from 32 to 49.
- 2There is a slight issue with this approach: what if one team had a streak of 4 games, but the other team had a streak of 5 or more because they had the necessary run differential before or after the four-game series? I only realized this problem while writing this post, but I’m too far into it to fix it this moment.
- 3Again, I’m probably missing some because of the issue I pointed out above. I’ll try to fix that at a later point.
Tulsa Sandlot Baseball
I don’t know Isaiah’s age or last name. He’s a stocky, tanned, thickset Sooner with a thick mess of curly brown hair and the same twang as all his teammates. His acned baby face and constant smile endear him to everyone around, which wouldn’t matter without that naturally generous and hospitable attitude, a tremendous work ethic, and an easygoing manner that brings everyone together. Most importantly, for the weekend I spent in Tulsa, Isaiah fully understands what Sandlot Baseball means and embodies it in a time when polarization emphasizes the importance of everything he, the Tulsa Breeze, and every other Sandlot Baseball team works for.
Continue reading “Tulsa Sandlot Baseball”A Great Twins Winning Streak
Last week, the Twins’ 13-game winning streak came to an end at the hand of the Brewers. I don’t professionally write about baseball, so I’ll leave the detailed breakdown to Jay Jaffe at FanGraphs. I’ll instead focus on how this streak felt as a fan.
It was magnificent.
Continue reading “A Great Twins Winning Streak”Pete Rose, a Threat to Integrity
A quote from MLB Commissioner Rob Manfred, pulled from the CNN coverage on the 17 players reinstated from their permanently ineligible status1Given how egregious elements of this decision are, it hardly feels worth nitpicking the nature of the phrase permanently ineligible as something that can be revoked.:
Obviously, a person no longer with us cannot represent a threat to the integrity of the game.
This is not obvious to me.
With institutions of culture like MLB, each notable player is a symbol, an icon, representing something greater than themselves. Who the institution allows to represent them fundamentally describes their standards, ethics, and beliefs as an organization. By walking back names from the—ahem—permanently ineligible list, Manfred is himself compromising the integrity of the game and claiming the reason Rose was banned was solely as personal punishment to he man, rather than a level enforcement of rules against betting on baseball that, though indeed having the effect of punishing the individual, also acts as a clear signal that the actions are not tolerated in the least.
This is a discouraging and cowardly move by a commissioner who does not care about the impact of baseball as a cultural phenomenon and is willing to sacrifice its ethos for… what exactly?
- 1Given how egregious elements of this decision are, it hardly feels worth nitpicking the nature of the phrase permanently ineligible as something that can be revoked.
Bad Hall of Fame Seasons
This post isn’t about who does or does not deserve to be in the Baseball Hall of Fame. It’s simply this: which Hall of Fame players had the most bad seasons, or the worst seasons in general. My thanks to Sports Reference’s Stathead for existing and making this easy to find. Let’s get started.
Continue reading “Bad Hall of Fame Seasons”Ella Black Series on Effectively Wild Podcast
Effectively Wild, a fantastic baseball podcast from FanGraphs, put out the third and final installment in the scripted series Only a Woman: Ella Black, Lost and Found. It’s an excellent historical dive into the first known woman baseball journalist in the late 1800s, who is woefully not generally known and has certain mysteries hanging around her work. Each episode is thoroughly engaging and well-constructed, and I only wish they were YouTube videos with basic imagery so more people would stumble across them.
Give the series a try. Each episode is about an hour and worth your time.